- Trade deficit with China has grown and the 17 Central and Eastern European nations should demand more from Beijing, European scholars write
- Coronavirus has forced the delay of China’s summit with the bloc, multiple sources confirm
with China, according to a report released on Tuesday.
The report by the China Observers in Central and Eastern Europe – a group of scholars associated with Prague think tank the Association for International Affairs – found that all 17 European countries in the initiative had seen their trade deficit with China increase since the group was established in 2012.
The report’s lead author, Ivana Karaskova, said the summit was postponed indefinitely, citing sources in the Czech Republic with knowledge of the matter, along with Czech media reports.
Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian also confirmed on Tuesday that the gathering had been put on hold.
The embassies of all 17 European countries received a note in mid-March saying that the summit had been delayed, a Beijing diplomat told the South China Morning Post on condition of anonymity. Further discussion about a new date had not yet taken place, they said.
The report released on Tuesday, titled “Empty Shell No More”, called for a unified approach to derive greater economic benefit from the relationship with Beijing.
Karaskova and her co-authors – 10 China scholars, each from different Central and Eastern European nations – advocated ways for their countries to band together before future summits, such as “17+0” meetings without Beijing at the table to develop agreement on unified demands.
The report found that as of 2018, the 17 countries’ total deficit with China stood at US$75 billion.
Foreign direct investment from China had slowly increased over the same period, although 75 per cent of it was concentrated in four countries – Hungary, the Czech Republic, Poland and Slovakia – leaving most other countries frustrated, according to the report.
“If China wants to retain its presence through these institutions, it is more likely (if grudgingly) to accept the ‘multilateral condition’ than to risk losing its influence altogether,” Karaskova wrote.
European nations should use the 17+1 platform’s cooperation programmes, which include economic, cultural and education activities, as “offensive instruments for targeting China with their specific demands” on “controversial” issues, Karaskova wrote. Those demands could include greater market access for European companies in China, or imposing limits on Chinese tech companies in Europe.
The authors also called on Central and Eastern European states to take action against undue political influence by Beijing, after a spate of recent controversies.
Czech media uncovered in October that the Chinese embassy covertly funded a university course on the Belt and Road Initiative, Beijing’s global infrastructure construction and investment strategy, and co-organised conferences on the subject, forcing a Czech-Chinese centre at Charles University in Prague to close down.
The report recommended that individual countries step up their own independent funding of Chinese language and cultural studies to avoid relying too much on Beijing’s state-funded programmes such as the Confucius Institute. It also called for local media to conduct greater scrutiny of China’s activities in their countries.
Additional reporting by Catherine Wong