Preface

As the international community takes an increasingly keen interest in the question of Tibet, the demand for information grows. The world is no longer obsessed with the political-ideological conflict between the two superpowers of the Cold War period, so that governments and non-governmental actors can, once again, turn to other burning problems, such as the situation in Tibet. Many governments are in the process of reviewing their foreign policy on many fronts. They should also thoroughly review their Tibet policy in line with the post-Cold War international reality.

Initiatives by parliaments and conferences in different parts of the world to address the human rights situation in Tibet and its underlying political cause, as well as moves by a growing number of countries to take up the issue again at the United Nations, have met with strong resistance from the Government of the People's Republic of China. One of the results has been a stream of propaganda booklets, following the Stalinist and Maoist tradition, intended to convince foreign readers of China's right to rule Tibet and the great benefits it has brought to the people of Tibet.

The present document, Tibet: Proving Truth from Facts, is intended to respond to the new demand for concise information on key points of the Tibetan question. At the same time, it serves as a response to Chinese propaganda, particularly the booklet issued in 1992 by the State Council under the title Tibet - Its Ownership And Human Rights Situation, published as a White Paper. The Tibetan Government-in-Exile does not have the resources to respond to each misrepresentation appearing in China's propaganda. But truth being on the side of the Tibetan people, we feel the need from time to time to restate the facts plainly, and trust that this will serve the cause of truth and justice.

This publication touches upon many areas of concern. It addresses the fundamental question of the status of Tibet, the invalidity of China's claim to "ownership" of Tibet, and the Tibetan people's right to self-determination; the "Seventeen-Point Agreement" and its effect on Tibet's status; the events surrounding the resistance to Chinese rule and the Dalai Lama's flight to India; the Tibetan social system before the Chinese occupation and democratic reforms initiated by the Fourteenth Dalai Lama; human rights conditions in occupied Tibet; deprivation of religious freedom; the state of Tibet's environment; issues related to the militarization of Tibet; and the on-going initiatives to find a solution to the Question of Tibet.

One aspect of the Tibetan situation has been insufficiently highlighted in the past, even though it is fundamental to understanding the context of much of what is happening in Tibet today. This is the profoundly colonialist nature of Chinese rule in Tibet.

We tend to identify colonialism with European colonial expansion in the past two centuries. But, as the Malaysian, Irish and other governments pointed out during the United Nations General Assembly debates on the Question of Tibet, colonialism in all its manifestations must be brought to an end, whether perpetrated by countries in the West or in the East.

The Chinese themselves view Tibet in colonial terms: that is, not as a part of China proper, but as a non-Chinese territory which China has a right to own and exploit on the basis of a relationship that they claim existed seven hundred years ago, or, at best, two hundred years ago. This attitude is evident from the title of the Chinese Government's White Paper, which refers to the "ownership" by a country of which it is already a part. The very notion of "ownership" of Tibet by China is both colonialist and imperialist in nature.

Colonialism is characterized by a number of important elements, all of which are abundantly present in China's rule over Tibet. The most common characteristics of colonialism are:

• Domination by an alien power
• Acquisition of control through military force; unequal treaty
• Frequent insistence that the colony is an integral part of the "mother" state
• Maintenance of control through instruments of military or administrative and economic power in the hands of the colonial power
• Active or passive rejection of alien domination by the colonized people
• Suppression, by force if necessary, of persons opposing colonial rule
• Chauvinism and discrimination
• Imposition of alien cultural, social and ideological values claimed to be "civilizing"
• Imposition of economic development programmes and the exploitation of natural resources of the colony, primarily for the benefit of the colonial power
• Promotion of population transfer of citizens of the metropolitan state into the colony and other forms of demographic manipulation
• Disregard for the natural environment of the colony and, in most cases,
• An obsessive desire to hold on to the colony despite the political and economic cost

Most of these characteristics are discussed in this document. Some of these issues are also discussed in the Chinese White Paper on Tibet in a manner and style which only confirms the Chinese leadership's colonialist and imperialist view of Tibet.

Secretary
Department of Information and International Relations